October 05, 2023

Both high and low HDL cholesterol tied to slight increase in risk of dementia

Experts say it’s important to keep close watch on your cholesterol levels.

A new study of older adults found a link between extreme levels of “good” HDL cholesterol and a small increase in dementia risk later in life.

The research tracked more than 184,000 adults for 17 years and found both high and low HDL cholesterol was associated with greater odds of developing dementia compared to middle-range levels.

However, no clear associations emerged between “bad” LDL cholesterol and dementia except in statin users, suggesting complex relationships between cholesterol and cognitive decline.

New research, published today in the journal Neurology, reports that high levels as well as low levels of “good” HDL cholesterol were associated with a higher risk of developing dementia.

The study involved more than 184,000 participants with an average of 70 years who were followed for 17 years.

The researchers were seeking to understand the relationship between two types of cholesterol, HDL-C and LDL-C, and the likelihood of developing dementia in older age.

While there have been some studies on this topic, not many have considered the influence of statin medications or examined the possibility of more complex associations.

The researchers explored these connections using extensive data from both survey responses and electronic health records.

Tracking dementia

The study subjects were members of the Kaiser Permanente Northern California health plan who were 55 or older.

These members had taken a health survey between 2002 and 2007, did not have dementia before the survey, and had their cholesterol measured within two years after the survey.

The research team tracked these members until December 2020 to see if they developed dementia.

They used specific methods and models to understand the data, ensuring they considered various factors such as demographics and medications.

The researchers said the findings showed that both very low and very high levels of HDL-C were linked to a higher risk of developing dementia.

Relationship between HDL-C levels and dementia risk

The researchers reported that people with the highest HDL cholesterol levels had a 15% higher dementia risk compared to those with mid-range levels.

Those with the lowest HDL levels had a 7% higher dementia risk versus the mid-range group.

Researchers said these relationships held even after accounting for other factors such as alcohol use, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes.

On the other hand, levels of “bad” LDL-C cholesterol didn’t show a clear link to dementia risk for everyone. However, for those who were using statins, a higher LDL-C level indicated a slightly higher dementia risk.

Age also seemed to play a role in the relationship between HDL-C and dementia risk but not with LDL-C.

While this large study shows associations, it cannot prove high or low HDL cholesterol levels directly cause dementia.

Erin Ferguson, MPH, a lead study author and a former Boston University SPH student currently affiliated with the University of California San Francisco, told Medical News Today that “we found a U-shaped relationship between HDL-C and dementia risk, such that people with either lower or higher HDL-C had a slightly elevated risk of dementia.”

“Overall, we found no association between LDL-C and dementia,” Ferguson added.

Clifford Segil, DO, a neurologist at Providence Saint John’s Health Center in Calilfornia who was not involved in this research, told Medical News Today that “studies looking into how to prevent dementia are appreciated as our treatments for dementia in 2023 continue to only provide modest clinical improvements.”

As a reminder, the three most common dementias are Alzheimer’s dementia, vascular or multi-infarct dementia, and Lewy-Body dementia or Parkinson’s dementia. Statin use, or medication used to lower cholesterol in our blood, has been proven to decrease a risk of second lifetime heart attack and stroke. Statin use needs to be studied specifically regarding decreasing the risk of multi-infarct of vascular dementia.

Dr. Clifford Segil

“This study looked at using cholesterol-lowering medications to decrease all dementia rather than statin use to decrease multi-infarct or vascular dementia,” Dr. Segil pointed out.

Further research needed to understand complex associations

Ferguson noted that “this work suggests that some lipoproteins (like HDL) may be modifiable risk factors of dementia, even in late life, but to take advantage of this we need to next evaluate whether these effects are causal and how to effectively modify HDL.”

While the magnitude of the association is fairly small, these results suggest that the relationship between HDL-C and dementia is complex. Our work supports a body of recent literature showing there are nonlinear relationships between HDL and other diseases (like cardiovascular disease and cancer) and mortality. The mechanisms for why these nonlinear relationships exist are still unknown.

Erin Ferguson, MPH

“Future studies will need to investigate causal relationships at play to confirm that there is clinical relevance,” Ferguson explained.

Segil agreed, saying, “more research should follow this study specifically looking at the role of using statins, or cholesterol-lowering medications, on the development of multi-infarct or vascular dementia.”

“Patients with memory loss often have MRI brain [findings consistent] with chronic ischemic changes and statins use may decrease these small silent strokes, but further research is needed to determine if this is the case,” she added.

Segil concluded by saying “elderly patients should not start taking statin medications to prevent dementia based on this study.”

Both high cholesterol and high blood pressure may put people at risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease.

Researchers from a European collaboration have found that people at a genetically increased risk for high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and high systolic blood pressure are also at a higher risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease.

Scientists believe these findings may provide new drug targets and improve early dementia prevention.

High cholesterol levels and high blood pressure are both known modifiable risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease — a type of dementia that causes loss of memory and cognitive decline.

Now, researchers from the European Alzheimer’s & Dementia Biobank Mendelian Randomization (EADB-MR) Collaboration have also found that genetically determined increased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and high systolic blood pressure are associated with a higher risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease.

Scientists think these genetic links could be used to develop new drug targets and treatments to prevent dementia.

This study was recently published in the journal JAMA Network OpenTrusted Source.

 What is HDL cholesterol?

 Cholesterol is a fat naturally made inside the body mostly by the liver and intestines.

 It is essential for helping the body make vitamin D and certain hormonesTrusted Source, such as estrogen and testosterone. And it is also an important building block for cell walls and body tissues, and also helps make up digestive bile in the digestive tract.

Because cholesterol is not water soluble, it is carried through the bloodstream via lipoproteinsTrusted Source.

There are two main types of cholesterol:

low-density lipoproteinTrusted Source (LDL) cholesterol, known as “bad” cholesterol, is known to build up in a person’s arteries, putting them at risk for stroke or heart attack.

High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, known as “good” cholesterol, helps eliminate LDL cholesterol buildup from the arteries.

Although HDL cholesterol is considered “good” cholesterol, too much in the body may be harmful.

Previous studies show high HDL cholesterol may contribute to inflammation in the body. And other research found high levels of HDL cholesterol can be harmfulTrusted Source to the heart and are associated with an increased risk of all-cause deathTrusted Source and cardiovascular death in men.

What is high systolic blood pressure?

A person’s blood pressure measures the force it takes for blood to move around their cardiovascular system.

When a doctor takes a person’s blood pressure reading, there are two numbers involved:

The top number, known as the systolic pressure, measures the pressure in the arteries when the heart is actively contracting.

The bottom number, called diastolic pressure, measures the pressure in the arteries when the heart relaxes between contractions.

Typical or healthy blood pressure is defined as a systolic pressure of less than 120 over a diastolic pressure of less than 80.

High blood pressure — also known as hypertension — occurs when the heart needs to exert an unnatural amount of force to pump blood throughout the body.

Sometimes it is only the systolic portion of a person’s blood pressure that goes too high, over 130. This could be caused by:

Searching for genetic associations

According to Dr. Ruth Frikke-Schmidt, a clinical professor in the Department of Clinical Medicine at the University of Copenhagen, chief physician in the Department of Clinical Biochemistry at Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet, and corresponding author of this study, it is estimated that up to 40% of dementiaTrusted Source cases can be prevented or delayed by modifying 12 risk factors throughout the life course.

“The evidence behind several of these risk factors is, however, of questionable quality. To recommend the most efficient preventive strategy, we need to pinpoint those modifiable risk factors that directly (are) a cause of dementia,” she told Medical News Today.

“Here, genetic studies of large populations can help us because a genetically determined modifiable risk factor is created at conception, and thus is a very clean estimate of the direct impact of that risk factor on future development of dementia,” Dr. Frikke-Schmidt said.

Because the genetic risk factor is determined at conception, Dr. Frikke-Schmidt continued, it will not be influenced by other potentially influencing risk factors happening throughout the life course.

“Therefore, these genetic studies of large populations can inform us robustly of the direct causal value of a specific risk factor. When we have this piece of evidence, we can with more confidence recommend preventing these risk factors (from) occurring, or if they are already present, they should be treated as early as possible,” she explained.

Treating health conditions to prevent dementia

After reviewing this study, Dr. David Merrill, a geriatric psychiatrist and director of the Pacific Neuroscience Institute’s Pacific Brain Health Center in Santa Monica, California, told Medical News Today that these are interesting findings looking at genetically-determined risks for what are considered modifiable risk factors for Alzheimer’s.

“So if somebody’s genetically at risk for high cholesterol or genetically at risk for high blood pressure — meaning in all likelihood they might have that throughout life — then that can relate to a higher risk in a causal way for Alzheimer’s dementia down the line,” he said.

Dr. Merrill said this might allow researchers to develop drugs treating systemic lifelong health conditions like abnormal cholesterol levels or elevated blood pressure.

“And by treating systemic health conditions more thoroughly or more aggressively throughout life, you can prevent the development of dementia so you never end up needing a treatment for the pathology of Alzheimer’s disease because it doesn’t happen — that’s exciting,” he said.

We definitely need more studies of the genetic associations predisposing people to modifiable risks and the subsequent outcomes in terms of dementia. In the field of dementia, we need more curiosity and more effort to optimize systemic body health, including cholesterol and blood pressure, to ultimately prevent neurologic conditions in late life like Alzheimer’s.”

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/both-high-and-low-hdl-cholesterol-tied-to-slight-increase-in-risk-of-dementia

Why men are more likely to experience severe Covid cases decoded

Biological reasons behind why men are more likely to experience severe cases of COVID-19 than women, offering a promising new strategy to prevent the viral disease.

The pre-clinical research in mice, published in the journal iScience, has yet to be replicated in humans, but points to the ACE2 protein as a key contributor to differences in COVID-19 outcomes between males and females.

Located on the cell’s outer surface, ACE2 plays an important role in controlling blood pressure and inflammation and protecting organs from damage caused by excess inflammation.

During a SARS-CoV-2 infection, the coronavirus spike protein locks on to ACE2 to enter and infect the cell.

“COVID-19 severity and mortality are much higher in males than in females, but the reasons for this remain poorly understood,” said study senior author, Haibo Zhang, from the University of Toronto in Canada.

The researchers noted that the gene encoding the ACE2 protein is located on the X chromosome, which means that females have two copies of the gene and males only have one.

The extra copy of the gene for ACE2 does not appear to make a difference in healthy people as the researchers found similar levels of ACE2 protein in healthy males and females.

However, following a SARS-CoV-2 infection, they observed a dramatic decrease in ACE2 in males while levels remained consistent in females.

The finding suggests that the additional copy of the ACE2 gene on the X chromosome is helping to compensate and maintain high protein levels in females.

The changes in ACE2 levels were also correlated with a drop in estrogen hormone signaling in males, which could also contribute to the sex-specific differences in COVID-19 outcomes, according to the researchers.

To test whether low levels of ACE2 were responsible for the more severe outcomes seen in males with COVID-19, the researchers devised a therapeutic approach using an inhaler to deliver lab-made ACE2 proteins directly into the lungs.

Males who received a daily puff of ACE2 after SARS-CoV-2 infection had less virus in their lungs, less lung injury and higher levels of estrogen signaling, they said.

Together, these results paint a clearer picture of how the extra copy of the ACE2 gene and higher estrogen levels in females work together to protect them from experiencing more severe COVID-19.

“A common misconception is that an increased presence of ACE2 receptors would result in a higher infection rate,” said Zhang.

“However, the enhanced activation of ACE2 in females actually serves as a compensatory mechanism during infection that’s aimed at safeguarding the lungs and other vital organs from potential damage,” the researcher added.

https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/health/why-men-are-more-likely-to-experience-severe-covid-cases-decoded-550345

Training your mind may offer chronic back pain relief, study finds

 Changing your beliefs about pain may help relieve chronic back pain, study finds.

  • About 20% of people around the world live with chronic pain.
  • One of the most common types of chronic pain is chronic back pain.
  • Previous research shows behavioral modification techniques like meditation and cognitive behavioral therapy are helpful treatment options for this condition.
  • Researchers from the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus provide new evidence supporting the effectiveness of brain-based treatments for chronic back pain.

Chronic pain can occur in any part of the body. One of the most common types of this condition is chronic back pain.

A recent study by researchers from the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus provides new evidence supporting the effectiveness of brain-based treatments for chronic back pain.

This study was recently published in the journal JAMA Network OpenTrusted Source.

An estimated 20% of the world’s populationTrusted Source lives with chronic painTrusted Source — a condition causing consistent pain that continues for three months or more.

A study in 2019 found that 39% of adults in the U.S.Trusted Source live with back pain. Up to 23%Trusted Source of the world’s population has chronic low back pain, which is considered the leading causeTrusted Source of disability worldwide.

Treatment options for chronic back pain include medications, physical therapyacupunctureepidural steroid injections, and surgery. Previous research also shows behavioral modification techniquesTrusted Source like meditationTrusted Source and cognitive behavioral therapyTrusted Source are helpful treatment options.

What is chronic back pain?

Chronic back pain can occur anywhere in the spineTrusted Source. Most people experience lower back pain located in the lumbar spineTrusted Source. However, the location of the back pain can sometimes be hard to pinpoint.

There are many reasons why chronic back pain may occur, including:

Symptoms of chronic back pain include:

  • pain (mild to intense), aching, and/or burning that does not go away
  • pain that extends to the legs, hips, buttocks, and/or past the knees
  • swelling in the back
  • difficulty urinating
  • fever
  • unintended weight loss

The brain and chronic back pain connection

Over the past few years, researchers have been studying the link between the brain and chronic back pain.

study published in January 2018 found people with chronic low back pain had decreased activityTrusted Source in certain parts of their brain involved in the release of dopamine — the body’s “feel good” hormone — that is also involved in the release of Î¼-opioidsTrusted Source that help relieve pain.

And a review of research published in July 2019 noted that the development of chronic pain is linkedTrusted Source to synaptic plasticityTrusted Source and changes in the central nervous system and other neural areasTrusted Source that regulate pain.

“For decades studies have tried to link back pain to back problems like bulging discs or bad posture,” Dr. Yoni Ashar, assistant professor of internal medicine at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and first author of this study, told Medical News Today. “It turns out these sorts of things only cause relatively few cases of chronic back pain. Most cases of chronic back pain are caused primarily by brain changes, like the brain amplifying signals it receives from the back.”

“There are two very important things to emphasize,” he continued. “First, the pain is always real. Sometimes, it can be caused by issues in the back and sometimes it can be caused by changes in the brain — but in all cases, the pain is real. Second, the sorts of brain changes we are talking about are completely reversible, and recovery from pain is possible.”– Dr. Ashar

Using pain reprocessing therapy to relieve chronic back pain

For this study, Dr. Ashar and his team studied the impact of pain reprocessing therapyTrusted Source on people with chronic back pain. Pain reprocessing therapy is a psychological treatment that teaches people to recognize pain signals sent to the brain as less threatening.

“Chronic pain is driven by a cycle of fear and avoidance,” Dr. Ashar explained. “People very naturally think their pain means their body is injured or broken, so the pain is perceived as highly threatening, and they avoid doing any activities that might make (the) pain worse. Once people shift their thinking to see the pain as due to misfiring brain pathways, they can learn not to fear or avoid the pain and to help recalibrate those brain pathways to bring down the pain.”

The study enrolled 151 participants with chronic back pain who received either pain reprocessing therapy or a placebo. The pain reprocessing therapy included a one-hour telehealth session with a doctor and eight individual one-hour sessions with a therapist twice weekly for four weeks.

Study participants who received the placebo watched two videos describing how placebos can powerfully relieve pain and received a subcutaneous saline injection into the back.

Surprising findings on pain recovery

In a separate 2022 paperTrusted Source covering the results of this study, researchers found two-thirds of participants treated with pain reprocessing therapy reported being pain-free or nearly so after the treatment, compared to only 20% of the placebo participants.

“We were very surprised (by these findings),” Dr. Ashar said. “In past studies of different psychological treatments, participants usually reported a reduction of one or two points on a zero to 10 pain scale. And people hardly ever reported a full recovery from pain.”

“In our study, most participants reported a full or nearly full recovery from pain,” he added. “This speaks to the power of this treatment, and the need to better understand how the brain can ‘unlearn’ chronic pain.”

Change in pain attributions may offer relief

This recent paper looked at the effect of pain reprocessing therapy on pain attributions, which are people’s beliefs about the underlying causes of their pain.

Before receiving pain reprocessing therapy, only 10% of study participants’ pain attributions were mind- or brain-related. Afterward, that percentage increased to 51%.

“We found that when we asked our participants before treatment what they believed to be the cause of their pain, almost no one mentioned the mind or the brain,” Dr. Ashar said. “Yet we know scientifically that mind and brain processes contribute to or even generate most cases of chronic pain. There is a big gap between what most people think is causing their back pain and what we know scientifically to drive chronic pain.”

“It may be helpful for doctors to help their patients see their pain as due to fearTrusted SourceavoidanceTrusted Source, or brain processes, rather than injury or damage,” he continued. “In our study, the more people shifted to seeing their pain as caused by something in the mind or brain, the more their pain was reduced. Many doctors are worried that their patients will not respond well to the idea that changes in the brain are driving the pain. But, this is often a hopeful message because these brain changes are reversible and recovery from pain is possible.”

The importance of a proper mental space

After reviewing this study, Dr. Jian Guan, a board certified neurosurgeon at Pacific Neuroscience Institute-South Bay and Spine Institute at Providence Little Company of Mary in Torrance, CA, told MNT it showed the importance of people with chronic back pain being in the right mental space.

“If you treat chronic back pain, you notice that absolutely for a lot of patients there is a mechanical and biological reason for their pain, but a lot of it also is mental.

And a lot of it is something where if you’re not in a good headspace before the surgery, or if you’re not in a good headspace when you’re undergoing pain management, you’re really not going to get the best results possible.”

– Dr. Guan

“Based on what this study shows, being in that mental space is very important,” Dr. Guan continued. “I think one of the real strengths of this study is they had a very nuanced and a very scientific view of how to break that down. I think for a lot of people they just think if you have a good attitude or something like that, but they really showed that it was a lot more complex than that.”

MNT also spoke with Dr. Ilan Danan, a sports neurologist and pain management specialist at the Center for Sports Neurology and Pain Medicine at Cedars-Sinai Kerlan-Jobe Institute in Los Angeles, CA, about this study.

“I’ve been a firm believer in looking at indirect ways in which to address pain beyond just direct treatments, medications, injections, and such,” Dr. Danan explained. “And the concept behind the connections between the brain and how one perceives and interprets pain has been studied on several occasions. And this study, I think, just further confirms how we can address what we interpret as centrally mediated painTrusted Source.”

“I think the more word gets out about ways in which we can address chronic pain, beyond medications and interventions, I think the more buy-in we’ll get from our patient base,” he added. “That can be the difficult and challenging issue at times is patient buy-in (to) this concept. But the overwhelming majority of patients that do elect to buy into this belief do find tremendous benefit.”

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/training-your-brain-offers-chronic-back-pain-relief-study#Change-in-pain-attributions-may-offer-relief

Risk factors for cardiovascular diseases that you can change

Heart expert reveals the risk factors leading to cardiovascular diseases that you can change

Cardiovascular diseases are the ones that impact the heart and blood vessels and identifying traits and lifestyle habits that can amplify the probability of suffering from a heart attack is essential since they serve as risk factors. Although some of these risk factors are modifiable, others are not within our control.

In an interview with HT Lifestyle, Dr Bipeenchandra Bhamre, Consultant Cardiac Surgeon at Sir HN Reliance Foundation Hospital and Research Centre in Mumbai, shared, “Some traditional risk factors associated with heart attacks include smoking, high blood pressure, high cholesterol levels, diabetes, and being overweight or obese. Additionally, there are several other factors that can increase the risk of experiencing a heart attack. These include having a family history of early cardiovascular disease. High cholesterol levels, metabolic syndrome, chronic kidney disease, chronic inflammatory conditions like rheumatoid arthritis or psoriasis as well as HIV/AIDS infection. A history of preeclampsia during pregnancy or experiencing early menopause are also considered additional risks for heart attacks.”

He added, “Another often overlooked factor is air pollution. Long-term exposure to pollutants such as delicate particulate matter has been linked with numerous adverse health effects, including an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Particulate matter can enter the bloodstream through inhalation and trigger inflammatory responses within blood vessels, leading to plaque formation and arterial stiffness. Addressing sleep patterns has gained attention as research suggests that poor quality or insufficient sleep can contribute to the development of cardiovascular illness through various mechanisms including altered metabolism and increased inflammation.”

Risk factors you can change:

The health expert revealed, “Tobacco consumption poses a significant threat to cardiovascular health as it is closely linked to heart attacks and strokes. The presence of nicotine in cigarettes and e-cigarettes leads to faster heartbeat and high blood pressure levels. Furthermore, smoking raises the probability of blood clots forming while also fostering the development of arterial plaque. Notably, even individuals who do not smoke themselves are at an elevated risk for heart disease due to exposure to secondhand smoke.”

Dr Bipeenchandra Bhamre concluded, “While certain risk factors like age and family history cannot be changed, lifestyle choices play a significant role in determining an individual's susceptibility to cardiovascular illness. Managing chronic stress levels, prioritizing adequate sleep hygiene and paying attention to air quality are all crucial steps toward maintaining a healthy heart.”

https://www.hindustantimes.com/lifestyle/health/risk-factors-for-cardiovascular-diseases-that-you-can-change-101696428564659.html

Premature babies in neonatal care units are susceptible to fatal illnesses: Study

The study shows how in neonatal care units, premature babies are more susceptible to fatal illnesses and infections.

Premature babies in neonatal care units are very sensitive and susceptible to potentially fatal illnesses. To help keep these babies safe, the danger of infection must be kept as low as possible.

A particular problem is late-onset sepsis which starts from three days after birth, when bacteria get into the blood and grow. This can be very dangerous and babies with late-onset sepsis end up staying in hospital longer, need more treatment with antibiotics and can be left with life-long effects on their health.

Bacteria from the Staphylococcus family are the most common causes of late-onset sepsis. Most members of this large group of bacteria are harmless; they are normal colonisers of our skin, which can even protect us from harmful microbes. However, some strains, when they end up in the wrong place and get inside the body, can cause major problems, particularly for immunocompromised individuals like neonatal babies.

Staphylococcus capitis is an example of this. This is a species that is usually content living on our scalp, face and neck; capitis means "of the head' in Latin. Some strains of S capitis are however associated with late-onset sepsis. One particular strain, known as NRCS-A, has been identified as causing serious infections in neonates around the world.

Scientists think this strain first emerged in the 1960s and spread globally throughout the 1980s as it evolved resistance to the commonly used antibiotic vancomycin. Strains circulating now show resistance to multiple antibiotics and reduced susceptibility to antiseptics that we use to sterilise the skin of babies. This makes the bacteria harder to treat and control, but exactly why this NRCS-A strain has become so globally successful has remained a mystery.

To try and understand what makes this strain able to spread around the world and to develop better ways to keep it under control, Professor Mark Webber and his team from the Quadram Institute and the University of East Anglia analysed the genomes of hundreds of S capitis isolates. They worked with two Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs), one in the UK and one in Germany, obtaining samples of S capitis from the skin and gut of neonatal babies, with and without late-onset sepsis.

Their results, published in the journal Microbial Genomics, found that the NRCS-A strain was commonly carried on the skin and in the gut of uninfected neonatal babies, and that transmission between babies within NICUs was likely.

By reading the complete genome of each sample, the team was able to identify tiny genetic differences between the S capitis strains that caused disease and those that didn't.

Professor Webber and his team found that the NRCS-A strains that can cause disease carried a set of unique genes, which they think allows them to survive in the gut as well as on the skin. This would make cleaning the skin to eradicate the bacteria ineffective as the babies will carry a reservoir in their gut microbiomes that cannot be easily removed, but can act as a source of infection.

The genes found in the NRCS-A strains allow them to be resistant to nisin, an antimicrobial compound naturally produced by bacteria in the gut. They also carry genes to survive exposure to the toxic metals that our immune system uses to kill bacteria, as well as genes to scavenge essential metals that are known to be hard for bacteria to access in the gut environment.

Further experiments also showed that the bacteria grow better in acidic conditions as found in the gut. Together, the evidence supports the idea these bacteria are adapted to exploit growth in the gut.

If metal scavenging is critical to infection, this may also be the bacteria's Achilles heel, presenting a new way to counter its threat. There is early evidence that feeding babies a probiotic supplement of benign bacteria reduces the rate of late-onset sepsis and that these 'good bacteria' can extract metals before the S capitis, preventing their growth.

"Studying how strains like NRCS-A have become globally successful is crucial to understanding how bacteria evolve to colonise different environments and to give us new ideas about how to reduce the risks of infection in vulnerable populations," said Professor Webber.

"We hope this work can be the starting point for more research to develop better ways to protect newborn babies from the terrible consequences of infection."

Dr Heather Felgate from the Quadram Institute and lead author of the study said "There are still many questions to answer as to why NRCS-A has become so globally spread amongst NICU.

But, working out how NRCS-A can evade the host immune system, spread and survive can also give us a head start with many other Staphylococcal species that cause sepsis in immunocompromised people in NICU and Intensive care units."

https://www.hindustantimes.com/lifestyle/health/premature-babies-in-neonatal-care-units-are-susceptible-to-fatal-illnesses-study-101696473884082.html

October 03, 2023

How diabetes can accelerate the growth of blood cancer: Study

The study shows that people with multiple myeloma have lower survival rate when they have Diabetes.

People with multiple myeloma, a blood malignancy of plasma cells in the bone marrow, have a poorer overall survival rate when compared to individuals without diabetes. This difference in survival due to diabetes was found in white patients in a subgroup analysis but not in black patients, according to a study published today in Blood Advances.

According to the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, 13% of Americans have diabetes, and the prevalence of the disease is rising quickly. The majority of non-Hispanic Black adults in the U.S. who have multiple myeloma, the second most frequent blood malignancy, are affected by this disease. While investigators have long been aware of the increased risk of multiple myeloma in patients with diabetes, this is the first study to examine racial disparities in survival rates among those living with these comorbid conditions.

“We knew from prior studies that patients with multiple myeloma and diabetes have lower survival rates,” explained Urvi Shah, MD, a multiple myeloma specialist at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. “But what we did not know is how these outcomes differ between races. Diabetes is much more common in Black individuals versus white individuals, and we wanted to understand whether this difference may play a role in health outcomes among patients with both conditions.”

Researchers conducted a retrospective study, collecting data from electronic health care records of 5,383 patients with multiple myeloma from two academic medical centers: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Icahn

School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. Fifteen per cent of patients included had a diabetes diagnosis (12% of white and 25% of Black patients).

Across the board, Dr. Shah and colleagues observed that among patients with myeloma, those with diabetes had poorer survival rates than those without. When analyzing results by race, however, they found that while white patients with myeloma and diabetes had lower survival rates than those without diabetes, they did not observe this finding among Black patients.

“What we did not expect to see here was that diabetes was actually associated with worse survival outcomes among white individuals with myeloma, but not Black individuals,” said Dr. Shah.

Dr. Shah added that generally, one’s risk of developing diabetes increases with age. Study findings also show that overall survival decreased with age. Notably, however, in this cohort, diabetes was 50% more prevalent among Black patients 45-60 years old than white patients over 60 years old. Younger patients may tolerate multiple myeloma treatments better than older individuals, and these differences could explain some of the racial differences investigators observed in survival outcomes.

When investigating the mechanisms behind these findings, Dr. Shah and colleagues observed that in genetically engineered mouse models, multiple myeloma tumors grew more rapidly in non-obese diabetic mice than in non-diabetic controls.After studying the biological mechanisms underlying tumor growth in these mice, researchers found that an insulin-related signal was overactivated in the diabetic mice, leading them to believe that higher insulin levels associated with diabetes may accelerate cancer growth.

“In my own practice, I work with many patients with both multiple myeloma and diabetes. And usually treating multiple myeloma involves many rounds of chemotherapy,” said Dr. Shah. “But this study suggests that we may also improve patient outcomes further by treating diabetes at the same time.”

Of note, this study was retrospective, and its findings do not account for how the quality of care patients with diabetes receive may impact survival outcomes, something Dr. Shah strives to better understand with future research. Further limitations include that race was self-reported and limited to the academic centers the patients included were referred to for care.

Going forward, Dr. Shah and colleagues aim to identify therapies that stop both the development of multiple myeloma and the overactive insulin signalling pathway they believe may be prevalent in patients with multiple myeloma and diabetes. Dr. Shah is also investigating how modifiable risk factors like the microbiome and one’s diet can be altered to improve cancer outcomes.

“While drugs are important, as oncologists, we need to also look at comorbidities and modifiable risk factors to improve patient survival outcomes. Therapies and lifestyle changes can go hand in hand,” Dr. Shah emphasized.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/lifestyle/health/how-diabetes-can-accelerate-the-growth-of-blood-cancer-study-101696247399372.html

New inverse vaccine shows potential to treat multiple sclerosis and type 1 diabetes, says study

The vaccine takes advantage of how the liver naturally marks molecules from broken-down cells with do not attack flags to prevent autoimmune reactions.

A new type of "inverse vaccine” has been shown in the lab setting to completely reverse autoimmune diseases like multiple sclerosis and type 1 diabetes, all without shutting down the rest of the immune system, according to a study. A typical vaccine teaches the human immune system to recognise a virus or bacteria as an enemy that should be attacked.

A new type of "inverse vaccine” has been shown in the lab setting to completely reverse autoimmune diseases like multiple sclerosis and type 1 diabetes. (Shutterstock)

However, the new vaccine developed by researchers at the University of Chicago's Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering (PME) in the US does just the opposite: it removes the immune system's memory of one molecule.

While such immune memory erasure would be unwanted for infectious diseases, it can stop autoimmune reactions like those seen in multiple sclerosis, type I diabetes, or rheumatoid arthritis, in which the immune system attacks a person's healthy tissues, the researchers said.

The vaccine, described in the journal Nature Biomedical Engineering, takes advantage of how the liver naturally marks molecules from broken-down cells with “do not attack” flags to prevent autoimmune reactions to cells that die by natural processes.

The team coupled an antigen—a molecule being attacked by the immune system—with a molecule resembling a fragment of an aged cell that the liver would recognise as friend, rather than an enemy.

The team showed how the vaccine could successfully stop the autoimmune reaction associated with a multiple-sclerosis-like disease.

"In the past, we showed that we could use this approach to prevent autoimmunity,” said Jeffrey Hubbell, the Eugene Bell Professor in Tissue Engineering and lead author of the new paper.

“But what is so exciting about this work is that we have shown that we can treat diseases like multiple sclerosis after there is already ongoing inflammation, which is more useful in a real-world context,” Hubbell said.

Today, autoimmune diseases are generally treated with drugs that broadly shut down the immune system.

"These treatments can be very effective, but you’re also blocking the immune responses necessary to fight off infections and so there are a lot of side effects,” said Hubbell.

"If we could treat patients with an inverse vaccine instead, it could be much more specific and lead to fewer side effects," he added.

Initial phase I safety trials of a antigen therapy based on this preclinical work have already been carried out in people with celiac disease, an autoimmune disease that is associated with eating wheat, barley and rye, and phase I safety trials are under way in multiple sclerosis, the researchers said.

Those trials are conducted by Swiss pharmaceutical company Anokion SA, which helped fund the new work and which Hubbell cofounded and is a consultant, board member, and equity holder.

"There are no clinically approved inverse vaccines yet, but we are incredibly excited about moving this technology forward," Hubbell added.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/lifestyle/health/new-inverse-vaccine-shows-potential-to-treat-multiple-sclerosis-and-type-1-diabetes-says-study-101696233842694.html

Malaria Vaccine

UN authorizes a second malaria vaccine. Experts warn it's not enough to stop the disease spreading

Oxford University developed the new three-dose vaccine with help from the Serum Institute of India.

The World Health Organization (WHO) authorized a second malaria vaccine on Monday, a decision that could offer countries a cheaper and a more readily available option than the world's first shot against the parasitic disease. WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said the UN health agency was approving the new malaria vaccine based on the advice of two expert groups, recommending its use in children at risk of the disease.

Research suggests the vaccine is more than 75% effective and that protection is maintained for at least another year with a booster.

“As a malaria researcher, I used to dream of the day we would have a safe and effective vaccine against malaria. Now we have two,” Tedros said.

Oxford University developed the new three-dose vaccine with help from the Serum Institute of India. Research suggests it is more than 75% effective and that protection is maintained for at least another year with a booster. Tedros said the shot would cost about $2 to $4 and could be available in some countries next year if funders agree to buy it.

Earlier this year, regulatory authorities in Ghana and Burkina Faso approved the vaccine.

“This is one more tool we will now have, but it’s not going to replace bed nets and spraying insecticides,” said John Johnson with Doctors Without Borders. “This is not the vaccine that’s going to stop malaria.”

Johnson was not part of the WHO expert group that gave the Oxford vaccine the green light.

In 2021, WHO endorsed the first malaria vaccine in what it described as a “historic” effort to end the devastating toll the mosquito-transmitted disease has on Africa, home to most of the world’s estimated 200 million cases and 400,000 deaths.

But that vaccine, known as Mosquirix and made by GSK, is only about 30% effective, requires four doses and protection fades within months. WHO experts, however, said the data to date on the GSK and Oxford-developed vaccines does not show which one is more effective.

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, one of the GSK vaccine’s biggest backers, stepped back last year from financially supporting Mosquirix’s rollout, saying it was less effective than officials would like and that funding would be better used elsewhere.

“The big difference with these two vaccines is access,” Johnson said, noting that only about a dozen countries are scheduled to get limited quantities of the GSK vaccine in the next few years.

GSK has said it can only produce about 15 million doses a year. The Serum Institute has said it could make up to 200 million doses of the Oxford vaccine a year.

Alister Craig, an emeritus professor at the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, said he would recommend countries trying to get the GSK vaccine switch to the Oxford vaccine instead.

If the new vaccine is rolled out widely across Africa, it could dramatically reduce the amount of severe illness and deaths caused by malaria in a few years, Craig said.

Neither of the malaria vaccines stop transmission so immunization campaigns alone won’t be enough to stop epidemics. Efforts to curb the disease are also being complicated by increasing reports of resistance to the main drugs used to treat malaria and the spread of invasive mosquito species.

“You would be foolish to think that this vaccine is going to be the end of the malaria story," Craig said.

In a separate decision, WHO's expert group also authorized the dengue vaccine made by Takeda, which was previously approved by the European Union drug regulator.

There is no specific treatment for dengue, common in tropical Latin American and Asian countries. While most infections are mild, severe cases of the mosquito-spread disease can lead to internal bleeding, organ damage and death.

WHO's expert groups advised that the Takeda dengue vaccine be used in children aged 6 to 16 in countries with a high prevalence of the disease.

Previous studies have showed Takeda’s vaccine was about 84% effective in preventing people from being hospitalized with dengue and about 61% effective in stopping symptoms four years after getting immunized.

Nearly 1,000 people have been killed by dengue this year in an ongoing epidemic in Bangladesh, the country's worst outbreak of the disease.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/lifestyle/health/un-authorizes-a-second-malaria-vaccine-experts-warn-its-not-enough-to-stop-the-disease-spreading-101696301985453.html