2023 has witnessed no shortage of medical firsts and
breakthroughs but has also seen many alarming headlines. What were some of
these intriguing studies and worrying trends? Our editors Andrea Rice, Maria
Cohut, and Yasemin Nicola Sakay discuss this
year’s stand-out research and health and wellness topics in our December “In
Conversation” episode.
2023 was a year of many medical firsts — from the first evidence that
anti-obesity GLP-1 drugs improve cardiovascular outcomes beyond weight loss
alone, to the FDA’s approval of the first RSV
vaccine ‘Arexvy’ in the U.S., this year has witnessed many
medical breakthroughs. Some other notable advances were lecanemab’s approval by
the FDA for Alzheimer’s after it was shown to slow cognitive decline despite
many concerns surrounding its safety. Norgestrel’s
approval. to be sold over the counter as an
oral contraceptive also made the headlines.
Speaking of birth control,
the lack of non-barrier options for men — unlike the plethora of pills
available for women — caught the attention of Maria Cohut, our features editor,
who did a deep dive into the whys behind this.
Andrea Rice, meanwhile, was
concerned about the rise in colon cancer cases in young people, while the WHO’s
announcement of sucralose being labeled “genotoxic”, or
DNA damage-causing, was a standout piece of research for me.
If you’d like to hear more
about how our discussion went, please listen to our podcast episode in full
below or on your preferred streaming platform.
Will I get cancer from using artificial sweeteners like sucralose?
The first topic
we delved into was that of the link between artificial sweeteners and cancer. This
particular piece of research found that a chemical in a commonly used artificial sweetener may cause DNA
damage .
The chemical in question
was sucralose-6-acetate, a metabolite of the sweetener sucralose. The study
findings showed that sucralose harms gut health and may lead to oxidative
stress, inflammation, and DNA damage, and hence increase the risk of cancer.
Dr. Hilary Guite, our
presenter, pointed out the most common food items that contain this sweetener:
“It’s in chewing gum, salad dressings, barbecue sauces, sugar-free jams…”
One important nuance here
was that this study was done on human blood cells. To see the same DNA-damaging
effect in humans, an average human weighing 70 kilograms would have to consume
18 liters of sucralose-sweetened beverages daily.
Andrea then asked: “Why
[is] there such little research about the cancer-causing effects of artificial
sweeteners in humans when we are aware that there are so many potential health
risks involved with consuming too much sugar in general?”
Although it is a difficult
question to answer, there are many obstacles — including funding, timing, and
ethical challenges in conducting such long-term studies in humans.
Why are colon cancer rates rising in young people?
Our next topic
was colon cancer and how worried we should be about the near doubling of cases
in recent years. The study identified four key symptoms linked to an increased risk of
early-onset colorectal cancer in younger adults. The symptoms
included abdominal pain , rectal bleeding, diarrhea, and
iron deficiency anemia.
Andrea started off with a
statistic: “[W]e’re seeing this huge increase in [the proportion of] colon and
rectal cancer incidence in people under 55. It’s doubled over the past 20 years
from 11% to 20%.”
She pointed out that early
onset cancer is defined as being diagnosed under the age of 50 and current
recommendations for colorectal cancer screenings start at around age 45.
Maria drew attention the specific
symptoms the study listed:
“[Out of this list of
symptoms], diarrhea is not uncommon. Iron deficiency anemia is not uncommon.
And what was emphasized in the study was that having just one of these symptoms
could almost double your risk of colon cancer, which to me was shocking. My
question is the question that everybody’s asking: Why is this happening?”
A multitude of factors can
explain the rise of colon cancer rates.
“[I]t may be attributed to
just being a byproduct of how we live and work. [M]ost of us engaged in any
type of knowledge work where you’re sitting all day, there’s going to be health
consequences. So lifestyle factors play a role, diet plays a role. Of course, a
person’s health history, and even family history of colon cancer can also play
a role,” said Andrea.
Meanwhile, I had one
question on my mind regarding the lack of oral contraceptives: “[A] lot of these trials were
stopped by the researchers or the funders after they saw that men had a lot of
side effects. One of them, for example, was mood disorders like depression. So,
my question is, we have something on the market already that causes such side
effects, but we’re subjecting millions of women to take these, why can’t men do
that? [W]hat do you think is the main reason behind this?” In the feature, Prof. Lonny Levin told Medical News
Today that female hormonal birth control continues on the market “just
because society has come to accept it” by now, but “the side effect bar for a
healthy person to take a drug is really high, and it should be.” “I would bet that we have
the technology and resources to create a male oral contraceptive that is safe
with minimal side effects. I mean, if we can manufacture and prove the safety
of a COVID-19 vaccine in a short timeframe, certainly, we have the ability,
from a science perspective to create this contraceptive,” said Andrea.
No comments:
Post a Comment