Scientists have found a link between neotame and damage to the intestinal wall.
- The
artificial sweetener neotame damages healthy cells in the human intestinal
tract, leading to serious health problems such as irritable bowel
syndrome, according to a new U.K. study.
- Neotame
is a sweetener formulated to be an ingredient in baked goods, various
other food products, and as a tabletop flavoring.
- The
study will result in fresh risk/benefit considerations of neotame as a
sweetener that can help people avoid overweight and obesity, themselves
drivers of multiple chronic conditions.
Neotame, an artificial
sweetener available for use in food products for which aspartame is inappropriate, may damage the
intestine, according to a new study from Anglia Ruskin University in Cambridge,
U.K.
The study finds that neotame can alter healthy cells
in human intestinal walls. This can impact the integrity of the gut wall,
potentially leading to
The U.S. Food and Drug
Administration approved neotame for human consumption in 2002.
It is approved in many
countries as a flavor enhancer and sweetener in cakes and other confectionary
foods. It is also found in some sugar-free gums, lozenges, and beverages.
Neotame may be introduced into foods in manufacturing or as a tabletop
seasoning.
Neotame is
The study says the sweetener can directly damage
epithelial cells in the intestinal wall as well as adversely affect bacteria in
the gut.
The study was conducted in vivo with
E. Coli (Escherichia
coli) and E. faecalis (Enterococcus faecalis), in which researchers observed
various pathogenic responses after exposure to neotame.
Among these was the
production of biofilm, and an increase in the ability of damaged bacteria to
cling to the intestinal walls.
The study is published in Frontiers in Nutrition.
How neotame
affects the intestinal epithelium
“Our
studies indicate that neotame causes an increase in stress signaling in our
human cells which reduces the amount of junctions that hold our cells together
in a tight barrier,” Havovi Chichger, PhD, BSC,
associate professor in biomedical science at Anglia Ruskin University, told Medical News
Today. She is co-author of the new study, along with Aparna Shil,
PhD, AFHEA, of Jahangirnagar University in Bangladesh.
“This weakens the strength of the barrier, causing
more leak of materials from the gut into our blood,” Chichger explained.
She noted that biofilms
caused by neotame are “linked to a range of potential issues including
heightened stress response and increased resistance to antibiotics.”
Super-sweetness
from artificial ingredients
Various artificial sweeteners are
many times as sweet as sugars found in nature. This is so that smaller amounts
of them suffice to sweeten a food product and add fewer calories.
Chichger agreed with this concept in principle,
saying, “As the public moves away from a sugary diet because obesity and
diabetes are increasing, artificial sweeteners have the potential to be a
useful tool in improving both these conditions.”
Dietitian Kristin Kirkpatrick, MS, RDN, who was not
involved in the study, agreed, saying, “When it comes to blood sugar control,
artificial sweeteners always outperform sugar. I’ve witnessed this repeatedly
in my patients.”
“Neotame was developed as
an alternate to aspartame with the aim of being a more stable and sweet version
of the traditional sweetener. It is very stable at high temperatures, which
means it is particularly suited to adding to baked goods. These features make
it more useful for food manufacturing,” said Chichger.
At the same time, Chichger
pointed out, “The issue with these ultra-sweet chemicals is that we don’t know
enough about how they act on certain environments in our body.”
Kirkpatrick said she hasn’t
seen much neotame in foods consumed by her patients. She tends to see “more
Sweetening
in the real world
The
hard truth is that a sweet tooth — regardless of whether it is satisfied by
natural or artificial sweeteners — may lead one to consume too much sugar. This can
lead to weight gain, and can cause type 2 diabetes. Being overweight also
increases one’s risk of heart disease and some cancers.
According to Kirkpatrick,
“Most of the research has found that stevia, monkfruit, and sucralose are not
harmful. Though some studies do indicate potential adverse effects. It’s
crucial to consider the body of evidence from which a study is derived.”
She pointed out that studies may find a correlation
between consumption of a sweetener and health issues, but not a causal link.
“It is interesting that
when you look at randomized controlled trials, people who use low- or
no-calorie foods containing artificial sweeteners to replace sugary,
calorically dense foods lose weight,” Kirkpatrick said.
Her real-world experience
is not quite the same, though.
“I have observed in my
patients over the course of 20 years — the real world, not a study — that many
of them will consume foods containing artificial sweeteners in addition to
their regular food. For instance, a patient I work with enjoys cheeseburgers and
fries, but often pairs the meal with a diet cola,” Kirkpatrick shared.
“If we go back to the
studies,” she said, “this example of confounding could often lead to incorrect
conclusions when looking at population studies versus randomized controlled
trials.”
“The more data we have, the
more power we have in our day-to-day lifestyle habits, including food choices.
More data is always a great first step — and I’d love to see more RCTs on this
topic,” Kirkpatrick added.
No comments:
Post a Comment