Researchers have mapped how pesticides impact specific gut microbes, uncovering potential protective bacteria and opening the door to new health interventions.
Study
in mice suggests potential for probiotic treatment.
Although previous research has linked
pesticide exposure to harmful effects on gut microbes, a new study is the first
to chart how specific bacteria in the human digestive system respond to
interactions with insecticides, both in laboratory settings and in an animal
model.
The researchers found that more than
a dozen commonly used pesticides altered the growth of human gut bacteria,
disrupted how these microbes handle nutrients, and in some cases, accumulated
inside bacterial cells. The team created a publicly available “atlas” detailing
these molecular interactions, which could support future research into disease
mechanisms and potential treatments.
Mouse experiments revealed that a
particular species of gut bacteria helped
reduce the toxic effects of pesticides, specifically by limiting inflammation.
This finding points to the potential for probiotic therapies aimed at
countering some of the health risks associated with pesticide exposure.
Gut bacteria may help detoxify pesticides
“We’ve provided further understanding
of how pesticides or environmental pollutants impact human health by modulating
an important collection of microorganisms,” said senior author Jiangjiang Zhu,
associate professor of human sciences at The Ohio State University.
“We also identified certain microbes
that can degrade, remove or clear some of these pesticides from biological
systems, which may be potential therapeutics in the future to help people clear
toxicity from the gut that have been introduced by food and water intake,
providing better solutions for human health.”
The research was published recently
in Nature Communications.
Lab study tests 18 pesticides and 17 gut species
The
researchers conducted laboratory experiments to examine how 18 widely used
agricultural pesticides interact with 17 different species of gut bacteria.
These bacterial species represent four major groups commonly found in the human
digestive system and are known to play roles in either maintaining health or
contributing to disease.
The pesticides tested included
well-known chemicals such as DDT (which is banned in the United States but
still used indoors in some regions to control malaria-carrying mosquitoes),
atrazine, permethrin, and chlorpyrifos. According to Zhu, despite restrictions
or bans on some of these compounds, residues from older, persistent pesticides
continue to be found in soil and water.
“We grew bacteria in culture and
exposed them to relevant concentrations of pesticides to see how microbes
responded to those pesticide exposures,” said first author Li Chen, a senior
research associate in Zhu’s lab, who managed over 10,000 samples that were
analyzed in the study.
Drawing from their results, the
researchers created a detailed interaction map showing how specific pesticides
affect gut bacteria. The network identifies which pesticides stimulated or
suppressed bacterial growth, as well as which bacterial species absorbed
pesticide compounds. This absorption may help explain how pesticide exposure
can persist in the body over time.
“Most previous environmental health
studies reported that pesticide contamination affects the overall composition
of gut bacteria,” Chen said. “We showed those pesticides really can affect
specific gut bacteria and detailed how these changes will affect the general
composition.”
Pesticide exposure alters metabolism and lipids
The analysis identified specific
metabolic changes in 306 pesticide-gut microbe pairs, leading to examination of
how those altered growth patterns and accumulation of chemicals affected
metabolites – the molecular products of biochemical reactions that break down
nutrients to produce energy and perform other essential functions. Metabolites
have numerous roles, from altering the metabolic process itself to sending
signals related to multiple cell functions and immune system activation.
In addition, the study team performed
a separate analysis zeroing in on another important class of molecules that can
be produced by gut microbes – the fatty, oily, and waxy compounds called lipids
that are essential to many body functions.
Researchers
also studied the effects of pesticide exposure in healthy mice first given
antibiotics to clear their digestive systems of microbes. The team introduced Bacteroides ovatus,
a common strain of human gut bacteria, to one group of mice and compared them
to controls after four weeks of exposure to pesticides.
Results verified what was seen in the
lab, showing that pesticides generated inflammation in multiple organs in the
mice and that the presence of the introduced bacteria after chemical exposure
set off a range of changes in metabolic activity and lipid production.
Specifically, an increase in some classes of lipids inhibited the signaling
pathway of a protein linked to oxidative stress.
Gut microbes could buffer pesticide effects
“We identified microbes that may
modulate the toxic effect of pesticides to the host by somehow buffering the
inflammation process,” said Zhu, also an investigator in The Ohio State
University Comprehensive Cancer Center Molecular Carcinogenesis and
Chemoprevention Research Program.
“We know inflammation is generally
bad for the body. If something toxic is going to induce it, and there are other
molecules that can counteract that agent, you may have a solution to intervene
or prevent larger-scale damage.”
In the next phase of this work, Zhu’s
lab plans to further explain where metabolic changes to gut microbes fit into
various health and disease conditions after pesticide exposure. He expects
other scientists will do the same.
“We are mapping out this central interaction between pesticides and gut microbes. And then other labs can leverage what we have discovered – for example, after exposure to a pesticide, gut microbe reactions may lead to downstream consequences that contribute to disease research and eventually help with predicting targets or identifying an intervention strategy,” he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment