Treatment of a COVID-19 patient who had a suppressed immune system with convalescent plasma coincided with the emergence of different variants of the novel coronavirus, says a new case study.
According to the researchers,
including Ravindra Gupta from Cambridge University in the UK, the dominant
variant that emerged in the patient after the plasma therapy possessed a
mutation that is also present in the one first discovered in the UK.
The findings, published in the
peer-reviewed journal Nature, suggest the possibility that evolution of the
SARS-CoV-2 virus can occur in immunosuppressed individuals when prolonged viral
replication takes place.
In the study, the scientists assessed
a male patient with a compromised immune system in the seventies who was infected
with the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
They said the individual was
unsuccessfully treated with antibiotics, steroids, and courses of the antiviral
drug remdesivir and convalescent plasma therapy over the course of 101 days.
Gupta and his colleagues said they
collected samples of the virus on 23 occasions over the course of the
treatment.
Their analysis revealed that the
infecting variant of the virus possessed the mutation that was first reported
in China.
They assigned this variant to the
lineage 20B, which had an alteration of an amino acid building block in the 614
molecular position of its spike protein -- the part of the virus which enables
it to attach to human cells.
Then the authors found that between
days 66 and 82, after administration of the first two rounds of convalescent
plasma, a shift in the virus population was observed.
According to the study, a variant with
two alterations in the spike protein became prevalent.
One of the changes was a deletion of a
building block at the position 69/70 of the spike protein's amino acid molecule
chain -- a mutation also present in the UK variant.
The researchers found another mutation
that leads to a substitution of a molecule in the 796th position of the
protein's amino acid chain.
They said this virus population re-emerged
after a third course of remdesivir (day 93) and plasma (day 95).
Commenting on the mutations observed
in the study, Simon Clarke, Associate Professor in Cellular Microbiology,
University of Reading in the UK, said the virus acquired a mutation to help it
escape antibodies, which also had the effect of making it less infectious.
"To compensate for that, another
mutation occurred to counterbalance that defect, so the virus maintained its
infectiousness," Clarke, who was unrelated to the research, added.
Based on the findings, the authors
believe repeated increase in the frequency of this viral population after
plasma therapy could mean the observed mutations may be conferring these
variants a survival advantage over others.
But scientists believe these variants
may not survive when the plasma therapy is stopped.
"..When serum antibody treatment
faded over time, the variant decreased in frequency, suggesting that the
variant was less fit than the original infecting wild type virus,"
Jonathan Ball, Professor of Molecular Virology, University of Nottingham in the
UK, said in a statement.
"This is important and highlights
that the virus will be experiencing lots of different, often opposing,
selective pressures, and we need to remember that whenever we consider the
potential impact and spread of new variants," Ball, who was also unrelated
to the study, added.
The authors concluded that the
emergence of this variant was not the primary reason for the failure of the
treatment.
Citing the main drawbacks of the
research, they said it was only a case study, adding that the generalisability
of the conclusions may be limited.
However, Gupta and his colleagues
believe the findings warrant caution in the use of convalescent plasma to treat
COVID-19 in immunosuppressed patients.
The Pioneer
No comments:
Post a Comment